2.5.3. Template types

Now, to separate the purposes of the templates in the solution, we need to define a number of different logical template types. These templates types are not represented as such in Sitecore but rather differentiated by the naming, where they are defined and how they are used in the system.

Interface template
Defines an interface for solution logic to work against, for example by defining the fields that are used by a module’s logic or by simply being a template in the template inheritance hierarchy of an item. Can also be referred to as a base template.
Page type template
Makes up the pages of the website. Derives from interface templates and has a presentation layout.
Datasource template
Items from this template are referenced by renderings as a datasource. Derives from interface templates but has no associated layout.
Settings template
Used for lookup items for fields or to hold fields to configure the business logic in modules.
Folder templates
These templates are used for the folder items that make up the scaffolding of the content structure.
Template Type Can have a page layout? Exists is which layers
Interface template No Feature or Foundation
Page type template Yes Project
Datasource template No Project
Settings template No Feature or Foundation
Folder templates No All Interface templates

Interface Templates are maintained in the Feature and Foundation modules and form the base of the content for the solution. They are never instantiated but are solely used as base templates for Page Type Templates or Data Source templates. The primary reason for this is that page items require a layout definition, and a layout definition inherently contains references to renderings in other features, which means that templates defined in one feature will start referencing other features, thus breaking the architectural principles, creating dependencies and ultimately leading to higher coupling and less flexibility and stability in the solution (see Dependencies).

Interface templates are prefixed with an underscore (_) to signify that they are interface templates and cannot be instantiated as items.

Interface templates can have an associated Standard Values item – given that the module in which they are created wants to set universal standards for the fields. Be aware that this standard value is universal and will be applied across all inheriting templates, sites and tenants.

Habitat Example

Examples of Interface Templates in Habitat are present in almost all Feature modules, for example in the Sitecore.Feature.Navigation module where the _Navigable template makes a page part of the navigation structure of the site.


Figure: Interface templates in the Navigation Module in Habitat Fields

The content fields for business and presentation logic all live in Interface Templates – never in Page Type templates or Datasource Templates. Therefore, these content fields live with the logic that use them (see References from code).

Since fields and templates should always be referred to by ID and not by name (see References from code), try to be as descriptive and editor friendly as possible when choosing a field name. Even though the item used to define a field has a Title field that can be used to specify an editor-friendly name for the field, it is common that this configuration option is not used. This means that the actual fieldname is presented to the editor. Therefore, avoid CamelCasing or AbbevInFldNames as this is not considered editor friendly – in other words, always prioritize the editor experience over technical considerations.

See more about fields and language support in Language and culture support Page Type Templates

Because of the flexible nature of the page layout in Sitecore, it can be challenging to determine how many actual page types a site will require. Theoretically a site could consist of a single page type, but with enough flexibility in the layout and datasources to cater for any type of page or content. This will greatly increase flexibility for the site editor, but would also require more work when adding simple content pages such as a news article. Alternately you could also configure a very elaborate set of page types with all necessary permutations of content and layouts, thereby making it easy for editors to create and edit new pages and perhaps also increasing consistency in the overall look and feel of the website.

Although there is no fixed result, the best option often lies somewhere in between these two examples. A good rule of thumb is to create page types based on the maturity and workflow of the editors, the information architecture of the websites, as well as the main entities of content. Page Type Templates are mainly used to assert consistency in the pages, to facilitate management, and to force stringent information architecture by defining insert options.

For example, it might be beneficial to define page types for the home pages, sections, campaign landing pages etc. of the website in order to define and maintain the overall hierarchy of the website. The leaf nodes of the website will most likely be Article or common Content Pages, or some of the more specialized News, Event, Product, etc. pages.

Furthermore, by defining very specialized pages, such as login, registration, forgot password etc., as actual page types as opposed to generic service pages, it can make it easier to maintain a consistent look and feel for these pages with the other page types.

The architecture of Helix makes this kind of flexibility possible by allowing you to define your page type and datasource structure independently of the features, and the primary instrument in this flexibility in template inheritance.

Interface templates and template inheritance in Sitecore can be compared to multi-class inheritance object-oriented programming, such as C++. In this type of programming, classes define the data they need and the business logic to manipulate or present it. Another class can then derive from multiple classes to inherit multiple capabilities from them.

In the same manner, a Page Type Template in Sitecore can derive from multiple Interface Templates to inherit their data and use the renderings (business logic) in its layout.

Page Type templates are only ever present in the Project layer, as these are the integration points for the functionality in feature and foundation modules. Page Type Templates are therefore maintained in a common folder for a Project, equivalent to a site type. Each page in a site of the given Project type are instances of a Page Type template. This is actually very handy as all page types of a site are maintained in a single location, which can make it easier to manage site-wide changes to all page types.

Page Type templates typically have standard values that set up the page type for all sites of the given project.

Page Type templates typically never have fields since there is never any feature-specific business logic in the project layer that can leverage these fields. These templates will get their content fields from the Interface templates from which they derive.

Habitat Example


Figure: Page Type Templates of the Habitat website Datasource template

Datasource templates are similar to Page Type templates in that they derive from Interface templates for their content. Datasource templates however do not have any renderings and are therefore used for items that are not part of the page or navigation structure of the website.

Like Page Type Templates, Datasource templates live only in the Project layer and typically do not have fields themselves.

Habitat Example

Because of the multi-site/multi-tenant nature of the Habitat project, the Datasource templates in Habitat are maintained in the Common Project layer module. This allows multiple project layer modules and sites (such as the Habitat site) to use these templates. This does not however stop a Project layer module from overriding one of the Common Datasource Templates and adding more or another functionality to it.


Figure: Datasource Templates in Habitat managed in the Project.Common module

Given the loose coupling and inheritance structure of the templates, renderings typically are unaware of whether the context item they are rendering is a Datasource or Page Type template. This allows the functionality of feature modules to be used in a wide variety of ways across Project layer modules. Settings templates

Settings templates can be managed in all business logic modules, for example Foundation and Feature layer modules, and are for any configuration settings (global or site-specific) needed by the module. Unlike Interface Templates, these templates are often not used by Project Layer modules as base templates, but are instantiated in the content tree (or under /sitecore/system) directly from the template defined in the module.

Depending on how dynamic the configuration needs to be, settings can be single items with predefined template with fields for the configuration data – or it can be an item structure where each item under a setting root holds the configuration settings, like key/value pairs.

To avoid coupling and to encourage greater flexibility, avoid reusing Settings templates across modules. Each module should define its own Settings templates and settings structure, even if two modules use the same technique for settings (for example Key/Value pairs).

Good Helix practice is to store global implementation-wide settings under /sitecore/system/settings/[Layer], as some settings can be confusing for the low maturity editor personas - but always carefully consider the maturity of the user managing the settings before deciding. For example, /sitecore/system is not generally available to the average, low maturity, editor and thus settings which are managed by this persona should be placed as close to the content as possible, for example under /sitecore/content/settings.

If there are settings that are tenant or site specific, they should be stored either under a site or tenant related item under /sitecore/system/settings or directly under the tenant or site in the content tree.

It is also considered good practice to allow low maturity editors to use the Experience Editor to manage the entire experience – including settings. Consider implementing feature specific Experience Editor extensions to allow for this.

Avoid storing environment specific settings in Sitecore. In order to move Sitecore content items freely between environments (for example on deployment to production or when testing with product data) these settings should reside in for example .config files. If there is a need for administrators to manage these types of settings, settings in Sitecore can point to different .config file settings for example <connectionStrings> or <sitecore><settings>.

Habitat example


Figure: The background type Settings Templates for the Media Feature module in Habitat Folder templates

Folder templates are the templates that make up the content structure outside the actual website structure, for example in datasource repositories, settings, etc.

Avoid using the Folder template provided with Sitecore (/sitecore/templates/common/folder). Instead, have each module define its own folder templates. This will allow greater flexibility for example in insert options and the content structure and provide better user friendliness, for example, in icons.

Habitat example


Figure: The datasource folder templates defined in the Common project in Habitat


Figure: The Habitat datasource repository using different folder templates Rendering parameters templates

In Sitecore, templates used for rendering parameters must derive from the Standard Rendering Parameters (as opposed to the Standard Template).

In Helix rendering parameters templates should be prefixed with ParametersTemplate_ to distinguish them from the other template types.